...hmmm...
A blog about building guitars. This started out as a document to chronicle the process of building one instrument but has grown to include pretty much any and all guitars that I attempt to build.
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Tear Outs (my hair outs)
...hmmm...
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
Image is everything
Monday, March 23, 2015
I see we meet again...
As it turns out - I only have so many clamps. I had wanted to glue-up and clamp both guitar bodies at once. But it wasn't meant to be. So, I'll be gluing up the second body after this one has dried (and the third body after that). Why yes, I am building three guitars at once. Is that odd? Seeing as my name is not Leo Fender - yes - yes it's odd. My thinking is that if I repeat the steps a couple (a few) times in a row they'll sink in better. Also, did I mention I bought an 8 FOOT BOARD OF MAHOGANY?! What else am I gonna do with it - build something useful?
What you are looking at above is a lamination. Or is it a lamentation? Could go either way...
You spread glue on both sides of all the pieces and clamp them together until - Hey Presto - you have one board of many colors. As you can probably see from the picture I was a bit heavy handed with the glue. In theory you don't need this much (there shouldn't be that much squeeze-out) but I am using a different glue this time out and didn't want to take any chances. The preferred glue for this type of work is Titebond wood glue (either type I or II). I only had Elmer's Wood Glue on hand. Let me repeat that: Elmer's WOOD glue. Do not use Elmer's white glue (or white glue of any kind). It is just not strong enough. The glue I used is still a 'PVA' type glue but as I've never used it - I erred on the heavy side. As you can see in the picture above the pieces have a tendency to shift on you as you clamp them. After I took this picture I went back and realigned everything so that all the laminations were flush on one end and on one side.
Some builders will glue up the smaller laminations first and then only have to glue-up three big pieces. I chose to glue up the whole kit and caboodle at once - as I have less free time than I used to.
You may find that a lot of pressure is needed to clamp everything up so there are no gaps in the laminations. If you have a jointer - this is less of an issue - because your pieces should be square to each other. I have no jointer - so I squeezed the crap out those guys. In the end though - if your edges aren't reasonably square no amount of clamping will eliminate the gaps.
Two notes:
1) I attached the clamps directly onto the body because I know I'm going to have a lot of cutaway. Normally you would use a thin strip of wood between your clamps and the finished piece - to protect the surface from clamp marks.
2) You can't see it in the pictures but I put a layer of wax paper between my work bench and the wood to catch any glue squeeze out. Trying to remove dried glue (not to mention a guitar body that has been glued to your bench top) is a royal pain. Wax paper is your friend.
Okay three notes... For those of you in New England like me - it's too cold out to leave this in your garage overnight to dry. Bring it inside. I brought it into my basement for a couple of hours and then into a living space. The idea being that you want to gradually raise the temperature of the piece from near freezing to room temperature.
...or pay to have your garage heated.
What, do I look like I'm made of money?
Okay, no really, last note: Drying time. I let this sit for 24 hours in the clamps. You can leave it for longer but the glue should be dry by that point (read the instructions on the bottle to be sure). As you can see from the picture below - there are nine clamps on that bad boy. I would have used more if I'd had more. Now, we wait...
2.0 - It's about time...
It has been seven years since I last updated this blog. In internet terms that's like 27 dog years or something.
I'm ashamed to say - I never did any of the things I said I was going to do in my last post. I never talked about the finishing details of building the Tele, I haven't posted any sound samples, and I haven't kept up with the site in general.
I am not ashamed to say that the guitar is still smokin' to this day. It sounds great, plays great and looks (weathered) but good. It has been my number 1 guitar for the last seven years. And is only now getting a bit of a rest as I reacquaint myself with the rest of my collection.
The process of building a guitar and then playing it was very positive. Perhaps a little too positive...
What, you may be asking, have I done with my time? Well, I've started a couple more builds:
http://jlapsteel.blogspot.com/
This was a lapsteel build. I finished the build but not the blog.
http://jerrysacoustic.blogspot.com/
This was an acoustic guitar build . I finished the build and the blog.
http://jerrys12.blogspot.com/
This was a 12-string semi-hollowbody electric guitar build. This build stalled. Partly because I was reaching a bit beyond my abilities but mostly because I became a father and I strangely didn't have as much free time as I used to. Odd, isn't it...?
So, it's been four years since I've worked on a guitar - and that seems too long.
There's a hole in my life. One that can only be filled with frustration, aggravation, and the eventual triumph of sandpaper.
It's time to unpack the wood glue, tune up the table saw, fire up that router, and continue the game of chicken with my remaining digits.
Can you smell that? It's the fragrance of sawdust in the air.
Let's build some guitars!
Monday, July 14, 2008
Part 1: Makin' a Tele

So, I decided that I needed a winter project this year. Something to get me off the couch, keep me off the streets, and make me try something new. I decided that building a guitar would be fun - challenging but fun. Here's my experience of building a Telecaster. I hope you enjoy it.
So, why build a Tele?
For the longest time I thought Fender Telecasters were a waste of time and wood. You could make a perfectly good Stratocaster with that hunk o' tree! Why would you want to waste it on a Tele? I used to say that Telecasters sounded like a tin cup full of nails. So, why in the world would I choose to make a Tele if I don't like them? Three reasons:
1) It is the easiest guitar to fabricate yourself. Seriously. It's a slab of wood, a neck, and some screws. There's nothing complicated about its construction (or so I thought). There is a reason this thing has been around since the 50's with little evolution. It's a simple idea that works.
2) I fell in love with a particular Tele about a year ago but was unable to purchase it at the time. It had a great sound and a fabulous feel to it. It was unlike any Tele I'd ever played.
3) Tastes change.
One note - I didn't decide to build this beast to save money. I could have bought a brand new Telecaster for the amount this project is costing me (not to mention the extra $ for tools!). But money was never the point of this project. …which is what I keep repeating to myself to help me forget how much I've spent so far.
I did a lot of thinking about this project before I started and I read as many blogs, wikis, books, and chat boards as I could to see how other people were tackling this hobby. For the record what I am doing is known as building a "Partscaster". My first step was to decide how much I wanted to do myself. Some people do everything from scratch - Body, Neck, the whole enchilada. They are very talented people with way too much time on their hands. I want to actually play this thing in my lifetime so I made a choice - I would make the body and buy the neck. I figured it was more of a challenge than buying everything and assebling it - but still realistic with my current woodworking/luthier skills.
One word about necks... They're frickin' expensive! The cheapest new one I found online was $100 (price+shipping). That was a quarter of my original budget for this project (that budget went out the window as soon as I started buying tools, oy!). I could have gone the ebay route but there are some things that I don't feel comfortable bidding on - this was one of those things. I don't want to pay some yahoo in East Overshoe for his Preemeeum (sic) neck.
In fact I was uncomfortable with the whole idea of buying a neck sight-unseen. For those of you that do not play – the neck really is where the rubber meets the road for a guitar. If the neck doesn't feel right to you as a player all the rest is bit moot.
A quick note about guitar bodies. You can buy them online pre-cut and ready to go. They too are ridiculously overpriced ($150 and up). It's wood! It is one of those rare things in life that DOES GROW ON TREES! Why am I being violated for a chunk of Mahogany that's one foot by two feet? Can you tell I felt a bit wrong-done? This was one of the reasons I decided to build instead of buy – that and the actual wood working sounded kinda fun.
Since I had decided that I wanted to make the body I was going to need a few things:
Good wood in the right size (more on this in a bit)
A template to trace out the shape of a Tele
A saw that can cut around corners
This is where I had a brainstorm. Or whatever passes for a brainstorm in the soupy mix upstairs. Why not just buy a guitar? No, really! Hear me out…
I decided that instead of buying a telecaster template online for $25 from some bozo who made it in his shed and then buy a neck I'd never get to touch prior to its arrival on my doorstep for $100 – why not buy a cheap import Telecaster? The cheapest ones are $160. So, I pay 35 bucks more – I get to try out the neck and I also get a three dimensional template – not some flat piece of particle board that I'll never use again. And hey – if I sell the body, pickups and hardware from the import after I'm done with it I could cover some expenses.
Well, that's what I did. In hindsight - the neck part was a good idea. The 3-D template was less so. I'll touch on that when it's relevant. I do plan on re-using some of the metal hardware bits and pieces from the Squier that I was going to have to buy. So it seemed like a good trade-off price-wise.
One note about imports (known as Squier Telecasters) - they sound pretty vanilla. They don't sound bad, per se but they have very little character. This is mainly due to the wood and the electronics used in their construction - two things I'm not going to re-use.
Okay, if you've read this so far you know my game plan - buy a crappy import Telecaster, buy some good wood, and get a saw that can cut around corners.
I started by looking for the guitar. I ended up buying the Squier Tele at Mr. Music in
The Squier: It has a maple neck with 21 frets. So, this was good news and bad news. I like maple necks but most Telecasters have 22 frets. For those of you counting - 24 frets equals 2 octaves. More frets means the instrument has a greater dynamic range. So, I lost out on that front but I did find a neck that is very comfortable and is also super fast to play.

Thursday, July 10, 2008
Part 5: Deep Pockets

The most nerve-racking part of this build - and not uncoincidently the most important part of building the guitar - was routing the neck pocket.

The neck pocket is the nitch carved out of the body where the neck is attached (in this case screwed to the body). It is usually around 3/4 of an inch deep but can be more or less depending on how thick your neck is. Having never done this before, I decided to use the Squier guitar body that I bought (this was the one time when buying the 3D template came in handy) to mark off on the neck how deep the pocket should be.

I put the Squier neck in the squier body and then took a mechanical pencil and marked off how much of the neck sticks out of the pocket. You then take a very precise mesuring instrument (something with 1/32 and 1/64 marks - 1/16th isn't going to cut it) and mesure how deep the pocket is by measuring what doesn't stick above your pencil mark. This is the eventual depth you will set your router bit to - thus creating the correct depth for the pocket. Again, with routers it is better (and safer) to do several successive passes. At least that's what I tell myself to justify the amount of time I spent on this...
So, how am I going to do several passes with the router without botching up the pocket shape (never mind depth)? Why, another template of course! This one is easy, Take some MDF (or plexiglass or plywood) and trace the area of the neck that sits on the body. I made a mark on the neck (again with a mechanical pencil) where the neck sticks out from the body. The easiest way to do this is to put the neck on the original body and make a mark where the body and neck meet.
You probably want to take good measurments if you don't plan to do things the way I did them (buying a squier to use as a template).
So, why was this pocket the most nerve-racking part of the construction? A couple of reasons...
The pocket is made at the edge of the wood - where chipping the wood is easiest. A router will naturally chip large chunks out of a piece of wood - out of spite. (okay it just seems that way).
The pocket is also made right at the glue joint - which seemed scary to me but I've been assured that at this point the glue is as strong as the wood - so no biggie.
But the biggest reason is that the way the neck fits into the pocket defines how well the guitar will play. If the neck sits in the pocket at a left or right angle the strings may not fret well (the strings could over-hang the neck in worst-case situations). If the neck sits poorly in the pocket there could be dead spots on the neck that don't ring out - or just as bad the action may be forever too high (this would be if the neck bent up or down at the pocket. And finally, if the pocket is too big (read I sneezed at the wrong time and made a "V" shaped pocket instead of a "U" shaped pocket) the neck will never correctly transfer the vibrations necesary for good tone or decent sustain. The goal is to have the neck fit in the pocket joint snugly - without screws holding it in place. I was unsuccessful in that respect - but the neck fits pretty good for someone who was shaking like he had the Delerium Tremens the whole time I was using the router.


It is also worth noting that after I finished making the neck pocket I sold the Squier body on craigslist. I think I got $30 for it. I included the body (still in near new condition), the Squier bridge, the neck pickup, and all of the guts (tone pot, volume pot, input jack, etc.). I kept the neck, the bridge pickup (for the short term - I ended up replacing that too) some of the hardware pieces (cover plate, tuning keys, strap buttons, neck plate, etc). All in all, between what it would cost me to buy the above items and what I got back from the sale of the body - I probably didn't spend that much more than I would have if I bought a neck (sight unseen), hardware, and guitar body templates. I ended up feeling okay about it. And I still have the templates that I made in case I want to do this again.









